Current:Home > MarketsTexas must remove floating Rio Grande border barrier, federal appeals court rules -ProfitSphere Academy
Texas must remove floating Rio Grande border barrier, federal appeals court rules
View
Date:2025-04-23 23:39:43
Texas must move a floating barrier on the Rio Grande that drew backlash from Mexico, a federal appeals court ruled Friday, dealing a blow to one of Republican Gov. Greg Abbott's aggressive measures aimed at stopping migrants from entering the U.S. illegally.
The decision by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals requires Texas to stop any work on the roughly 1,000-foot barrier and move it to the riverbank. The order sided with a lower court decision in September that Abbott called "incorrect" and had predicted would be overturned.
Instead, the New Orleans-based court handed Texas its second legal defeat this week over its border operations. On Wednesday, a federal judge allowed U.S. Border Patrol agents to continue cutting razor wire the state installed along the riverbank, despite the protests of Texas officials.
For months, Texas has asserted that parts of the Rio Grande are not subject to federal laws protecting navigable waters. But the judges said the lower court correctly sided with the Biden administration.
"It considered the threat to navigation and federal government operations on the Rio Grande, as well as the potential threat to human life the floating barrier created," Judge Dana Douglas wrote in the opinion.
Abbott called the decision "clearly wrong" in a statement on social media, and said the state would immediately seek a rehearing from the court.
"We'll go to SCOTUS if needed to protect Texas from Biden's open borders," Abbott posted.
The Biden administration sued Abbott over the linked and anchored buoys — which stretch roughly the length of three soccer fields — after the state installed the barrier along the international border with Mexico. The buoys are between the Texas border city of Eagle Pass and Piedras Negras, Coahuila.
Thousands of people were crossing into the U.S. illegally through the area when the barrier was installed. The lower district court ordered the state to move the barriers in September, but Texas' appeal temporarily delayed that order from taking effect.
The Biden administration sued under what is known as the Rivers and Harbors Act, a law that protects navigable waters.
In a dissent, Judge Don Willet, an appointee of former President Donald Trump and a former Texas Supreme Court justice, said the order to move the barriers won't dissolve any tensions that the Biden administration said have been ramping up between the U.S. and Mexico governments.
"If the district court credited the United States' allegations of harm, then it should have ordered the barrier to be not just moved but removed," Willet wrote. "Only complete removal would eliminate the "construction and presence" of the barrier and meet Mexico's demands."
Nearly 400,000 people tried to enter the U.S. through the section of the southwest border that includes Eagle Pass last fiscal year.
In the lower court's decision, U.S. District Judge David Ezra cast doubt on Texas' rationale for the barrier. He wrote at the time that the state produced no "credible evidence that the buoy barrier as installed has significantly curtailed illegal immigration."
Officials with U.S. Customs and Border Protection did not immediately comment.
- In:
- Texas
- Rio Grande
- Migrants
veryGood! (4)
Related
- Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
- Gene therapy for muscular dystrophy stirs hopes and controversy
- Back pain shouldn't stop you from cooking at home. Here's how to adapt
- Missing sub passenger knew risks of deep ocean exploration: If something goes wrong, you are not coming back
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- First U.S. Nuclear Power Closures in 15 Years Signal Wider Problems for Industry
- This Coastal Town Banned Tar Sands and Sparked a War with the Oil Industry
- Women are returning their period blood to the Earth. Why?
- Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
- Worldwide Effort on Clean Energy Is What’s Needed, Not a Carbon Price
Ranking
- Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
- Back pain shouldn't stop you from cooking at home. Here's how to adapt
- Eli Lilly says an experimental drug slows Alzheimer's worsening
- 'It's not for the faint-hearted' — the story of India's intrepid women seaweed divers
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- Accidental shootings by children keep happening. How toddlers are able to fire guns.
- Horoscopes Today, July 23, 2023
- Assault suspect who allegedly wrote So I raped you on Facebook still on the run 2 years after charges were filed
Recommendation
Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
A Big Rat in Congress Helped California Farmers in Their War Against Invasive Species
What is the GOLO diet? Experts explain why its not for everyone.
If you're 40, it's time to start mammograms, according to new guidelines
Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
Unfamiliar Ground: Bracing for Climate Impacts in the American Midwest
College Graduation Gift Guide: 17 Must-Have Presents for Every Kind of Post-Grad Plan
'It's not for the faint-hearted' — the story of India's intrepid women seaweed divers