Current:Home > FinanceAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -ProfitSphere Academy
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-12 20:32:11
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (74)
Related
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- Before Danelo Cavalcante, a manhunt in the '90s had Pennsylvania on edge
- Citing sustainability, Starbucks wants to overhaul its iconic cup. Will customers go along?
- Delegation from Yemen’s Houthi rebels flies into Saudi Arabia for peace talks with kingdom
- $73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
- Closing arguments set to begin in Texas AG Ken Paxton’s impeachment trial over corruption charges
- What started as flu symptoms leads to Tennessee teen having hands, legs amputated
- Around 3,000 jobs at risk at UK’s biggest steelworks despite government-backed package of support
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- Majority-Black school districts have far less money to invest in buildings — and students are feeling the impact
Ranking
- Sam Taylor
- Ex-Guatemala anti-corruption prosecutor granted asylum in US
- Nobel Foundation raises the amount for this year’s Nobel Prize awards to 11 million kronor
- The Justice Department says there’s no valid basis for the judge to step aside from Trump’s DC case
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- President Zelenskyy to visit Washington, DC next week: Sources
- 'Horrible movie': Davante Adams praying for Aaron Rodgers after Achilles injury
- Tory Lanez to serve 10-year sentence in state prison after bail motion denied by judge
Recommendation
Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
Hunter Biden sues former Trump White House aide over release of private material
Libya flooding presents unprecedented humanitarian crisis after decade of civil war left it vulnerable
Providence's hurricane barrier is ready for Hurricane Lee. Here's how it will work.
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
Preparing homes for wildfires is big business that's only getting started
¿Cuándo es el Día de la Independencia en México? No, no es el 5 de mayo
She danced with Putin at her wedding. Now the former Austrian foreign minister has moved to Russia